Description
Noctum is essentially me messing around with nrts
layouts to say 'hey, what would happen if I swapped
s
and r
?' It makes some compromises by creating some sfbs on left index but otherwise should work
really well. By having a c
vowel index I could create a fsv
column to minimize bot row usage.
Because all sfbs on the r
index are with r
or l
, keys there are arranged in a way that the most
common sfbs are the easiest to alt. b
should also sit pretty together with n
, as they basically
don't interact. dtm
also works really well as a column, though it does make rl
in rld
somewhat
awkward to alt. Overall Noctum minimizes redirects while creating a nice balance of (in)rolls and
alternation, all while having some really nice onehands to boot.
Creation
As pointed out, I basically messed around with nrts
to create this. This did mean that initially it
had h
on right hand like Gallium, Graphite, being forced into a csw
ring column with dtg
on middle
just to make it work. Figuring out that I could put h
on left index as well meant that a lot of things
fell into place where w
, c
and g
found positions they actually work well at.
Thoughts
Noctum creates really nice nst
and str
onehands yes, but leaves some questions to be answered. dtm
felt like a nobrainer as did bn
, but some words like number
actually have a lot of up and down
movement I really didn't enjoy even though none of these movements are scissors, something I was keeping a
close eye on then. This is also unfortunately true for that h
position: while it looks decent in theory,
stuff like thr
feels really awful and almost invalidates the whole layout for me, even though the rest is
honestly pretty great. I hit 100wpm with this layout but I dropped it after. I don't think I can recommend
this layout over Sturdy,
Stronk or
Dhorf at this point.
Analyzer stats
Dsfb: 6.306%
Finger Speed: 22.285
[1.348, 1.451, 3.700, 5.074, 2.949, 2.361, 2.658, 2.744]
Scissors: 0.387%
Lsbs: 1.432%
Inrolls: 26.060%
Outrolls: 17.154%
Total Rolls: 43.214%
Onehands: 2.030%
Alternates: 33.693%
Alternates (sfs): 7.588%
Total Alternates: 41.281%
Redirects: 2.535%
Redirects Sfs: 1.284%
Bad Redirects: 0.259%
Bad Redirects Sfs: 0.143%
Total Redirects: 4.221%
Bad Sfbs: 0.435%
Sft: 0.012%